Allen Bradley 1784-PKTX, Woodhead SST-DHP-PCI / 5136-SD-PCI, Equustek DLCPIe and Microsoft Windows Security Support

If you have an Allen Bradley 1784-PKTX or SST’s  SST-DHP-PCI / 5136-SD-PCI on a desktop running Windows 7,  we all know that on Jan 2020 Microsoft will stop releasing security updates for Windows 7, which means you need to upgrade to a new desktop running a newer Windows version, like Windows 10.

The problem you will run into upgrading your system is that Allen Bradley and SST Woodhead are not making the card for new desktop computers that have the PCI Express bus, however, Equustek has the solution with their DLPCIe that comes in two hardware versions, one for DH+ and another for DH485, which can reside in any new desktop with PCI Express bus X1 ,X2 X4, X8 and X16 and drivers are available for all Windows versions  including Windows 10 32 bit and 64 bit.

Equustek DLPCIe has another advantage by adding a 9 pin DSUB regular RS232 serial communication port which most of new desktops don’t come with, that serial port can be used for any RS232 serial communications that will facilitate connecting your RS232 serial device to your desktop.

For details see links below.

https://www.equustek.com/dlpcie-dh-df1-dh/

https://www.equustek.com/dlpcie-dh485-df1-dh485/

The Difference Between Profibus And Profinet

Profibus and Profinet are two terms that are often confused with each other, both of them being field networks part of industrial automation protocols. However, there are significant differences between the two in various aspects and for the same reason are used for different purposes in industries.

In order to clearly understand their functioning and application of the two, it is important to first get a good grasp of the basics.

The basics

Profibus which is the acronym for Process Field Bus is basically a standard for fieldbus communication used in automation technology. Profinet on the other hand, which is acronym for Process Field Net is a standard for internet communication over industrial Ethernet.
As they are both very popular and highly sought after automation protocols created by the same organization, they do share a number of similarities. They are both created and maintained by Profibus and Profinet International.
However, Profinet comparatively has extra advanced capabilities that facilitate a faster and a more flexible field of communication within a network.

ethernet_profinet_graphicThey share the same application profiles; which essentially implies that they have similar guidelines followed by different categories of devices within a network, regarding their use of Profibus and Profinet data during communication. These profiles enable smooth planning and functioning of the automation systems and devices.

Other than that they are also very similar in terms of their engineering concepts and they use General Station Description files to define the hardware for each device. The file type however is different.

In simple terms Profibus is a classic and traditional automation protocol based on serial communication while Profinet is a newer enhanced automation protocol based on Industrial Ethernet.

Significant points of differences

Profibus and Profinet use GSD files for define the hardware for various devices. But as mentioned before, the difference lies in the type of file being used. Profibus uses ASCII files whereas Profinet uses XML files.

In terms of their base field, Profinet made the move from RS-485 to Ethernet to become more efficient and ubiquitous. It is a more adaptable and modern technology that helps organizations future-proof their processes.
Besides that, being based on industrial Ethernet, Profinet also enjoys a higher bandwidth, a larger size of message and unlimited amounts of address space. Separate controllers attached to the network may have to adhere to certain limitations in terms of address space, depending on their memory capacity and processor capabilities though.

profibus_chart

Other than that, Profinet is faster than Profibus because of the provider/consumer model that it uses, where any node in the network is allowed to communicate at any given time. Hence, there is no delay in information exchange.
Besides that, Ethernet networks are generally switched networks that are practically devoid of network collisions.
Profibus uses a master/slave approach rather than a provider/ consumer model where the master is usually in charge of the entire network and the nodes are allowed to communicate only when prompted.

Usually industrial enterprises are required to deploy separate gateways in order to communicate with other networks. However, with Profinet, it creates its own proxies for translation and data exchange between two different networks and unlike an ordinary gateway they are defined in an open standard.
In case of Profibus, there is a facility for wireless transmission of messages; however, it requires similar based proprietary radios at both ends.
As Profinet works on standard Ethernet, it can easily use WiFi or Bluetooth for wireless transmission.

Even though Profinet is an enhanced and more versatile version of Profibus, it does not mean that the former can be used across industries regardless of the processes. It is important to study the field of automation and choose the protocol accordingly.

Image sources:
https://w3.usa.siemens.com/automation/us/en/industrial-controls/products/industrial-communications/profinet/pages/profibus-to-profinet.aspx
https://www.rtaautomation.com/technologies/profinet-io/